https://arstechnica.com/security/2026/0 ... facturers/
https://eclypsium.com/blog/your-kvm-is- ... e-network/
Hi, I would like to know if the Luckfox PicoKVM is vulnerable to the above. The PicoKVM is not the list, but that is because it wasn't tested. I hope we can get some answers, and if it is vulnerable, whether it will be fixed or not.
New IPKVM vulnerabilities posted today (Mar 18, 2026) on Ars. Is the PicoKVM vulnerable as well?
Hello, currently Picokvm is actively undergoing updates. Previously, the issue of brute force cracking has been resolved. Regarding system upgrades, in the past, to ensure security, customers were required to manually download the firmware for local upgrade.
The OTA function was only recently initially launched. However, there are still deficiencies in the firmware signature verification. We will promptly fix this problem.
We welcome any security-related suggestions and will actively cooperate in addressing them.
The OTA function was only recently initially launched. However, there are still deficiencies in the firmware signature verification. We will promptly fix this problem.
We welcome any security-related suggestions and will actively cooperate in addressing them.
Thank you for your reply. It is assuring that you are actively fixing such issues. Keep up the good work!Crocodile wrote: ↑2026-03-19 1:34 Hello, currently Picokvm is actively undergoing updates. Previously, the issue of brute force cracking has been resolved. Regarding system upgrades, in the past, to ensure security, customers were required to manually download the firmware for local upgrade.
The OTA function was only recently initially launched. However, there are still deficiencies in the firmware signature verification. We will promptly fix this problem.
We welcome any security-related suggestions and will actively cooperate in addressing them.