Power consumption on Core1106 or Ultra W
Posted: 2025-05-15 13:57
Hi everyone,
I've been testing the Luckfox Pico Pro board to help me with the Luckfox Core1106 board,
The difference is NAND flash instead of eMMC, and no WiFi module. With a simple script that puts the Pro into sleep mode, we managed to reduce power consumption to 0.11W (22mA @ 5V).
Now, I want to achieve the same power consumption on the Luckfox Core1106 board, but so far, it seems to draw more power - 0.30W (56mA @ 5V).
The only differences I can see are:
* Pico Pro uses NAND flash, while Core1106 uses eMMC
* Pico Pro has no WiFi module, while Core1106 does
I did check by checking powers that the NAND flash does actually goes to standby where it draws around 10uA of power so the 0.11W are consumed only from RV1106. Thus we assume that 0.17W (0.28W - 0.11W) is coming from either Wifi module or the eMMC.
We've also realised that Pico Ultra W behaves in a similar way as the Core1106 and has the same components and also has a similar power consumption so:
1. We would like to know if anyone could power up their Pico Ultra board (not Pico Ultra W board) - which is without the WiFi chip and measure the power consumption it requires in the sleep mode when this is run:
2. Are there specific configurations, hardware modifications, or software adjustments that I can apply to the Core1106 to achieve the same power consumption as the Pico Pro or at least as low as possible?
Thanks!
I've been testing the Luckfox Pico Pro board to help me with the Luckfox Core1106 board,
The difference is NAND flash instead of eMMC, and no WiFi module. With a simple script that puts the Pro into sleep mode, we managed to reduce power consumption to 0.11W (22mA @ 5V).
Now, I want to achieve the same power consumption on the Luckfox Core1106 board, but so far, it seems to draw more power - 0.30W (56mA @ 5V).
The only differences I can see are:
* Pico Pro uses NAND flash, while Core1106 uses eMMC
* Pico Pro has no WiFi module, while Core1106 does
I did check by checking powers that the NAND flash does actually goes to standby where it draws around 10uA of power so the 0.11W are consumed only from RV1106. Thus we assume that 0.17W (0.28W - 0.11W) is coming from either Wifi module or the eMMC.
We've also realised that Pico Ultra W behaves in a similar way as the Core1106 and has the same components and also has a similar power consumption so:
1. We would like to know if anyone could power up their Pico Ultra board (not Pico Ultra W board) - which is without the WiFi chip and measure the power consumption it requires in the sleep mode when this is run:
Code: Select all
echo mem > /sys/power/state
Thanks!